What Moved
The Bank of Canada held its overnight rate at 1.75% on December 4, closing out a year in which the Bank held steady at every decision (BoC, Dec 4, 2019). In contrast, the US Fed cut rates three times, bringing its benchmark from 2.25-2.50% to 1.50-1.75%. As investors finalized their year-end investment strategy, the divergence between Canadian and US monetary policy shaped portfolio positioning across private markets.
Canadian housing closed the year on a strong note. National sales volumes for 2019 rebounded meaningfully from the stress-test-depressed 2018 levels. Toronto and Montreal led the recovery, while Vancouver was stabilizing. Year-over-year price growth had turned positive in most major markets (CREA, Dec 2019).
Bloomberg's annual assessment ranked Canada as having the second-largest housing bubble risk among OECD nations — a headline that drew attention even as the market strengthened.
The MIC sector ended 2019 with notably higher AUM than it began. Investor demand for yield — with GICs around 2% and government bonds below 1.5% — had driven sustained capital inflows into private credit throughout the year.
Canadian PE deal activity for 2019 was steady, with the CVCA reporting healthy mid-market transaction volumes and several notable exits (CVCA, 2019 Annual).
What It Means
2019 was a year of stability for Canadian private markets — and stability, in this context, was a feature. The BoC held rates steady, the economy grew modestly, housing adjusted and recovered, and private credit delivered on its yield promise without significant stress.
For the full year, Canadian MIC investors who selected quality managers earned 6-8% returns with low default rates and consistent monthly distributions. That compared favorably to most traditional fixed-income alternatives and validated the asset class for investors with appropriate risk tolerance and liquidity timelines.
Private equity investors benefited from a stable economic environment that supported deal activity and exits. Canadian mid-market PE continued to offer attractive risk-adjusted returns relative to public equity, particularly for investors willing to accept multi-year lock-ups.
The Bloomberg housing bubble ranking was worth noting but not alarming in isolation. Canada's housing market had structural demand drivers — immigration, urbanization, constrained supply — that distinguished it from pure speculative bubbles. The risk was real but nuanced.
What We're Watching
Heading into 2020, the consensus outlook was for continued stability — steady Canadian rates, moderate economic growth, and an active private markets environment. Trade tensions were expected to moderate, and housing was expected to continue its recovery.
The wildcard — though virtually no one was watching it in December 2019 — was an emerging respiratory illness in Wuhan, China. Reports were sparse and drew little mainstream attention.
For private market investors, the year-end priority was portfolio construction. The 2019 experience reinforced the case for Canadian alternative investments as a complement to traditional portfolios: yield, diversification, and insulation from public market volatility. Investors who had maintained disciplined private market allocations through the year's trade-war volatility were generally rewarded with stable, above-benchmark returns.
Closing
2019 delivered what private market investors value most: predictability. The rate environment was stable, private credit performed, and real estate found its footing. As the year closed, the outlook appeared benign. Within three months, that outlook would change entirely.
For the full quarterly analysis, see Q4 2019: Canada's Housing Bubble Warning.
Alts Insider provides educational content for Canadian accredited investors. This is not investment advice. Always consult qualified professionals before making investment decisions.